Experimental Pragmatic
Approaches to Interactive Music Systems Inspired by Music Analysis
The field of interactive music systems (IMSs), beginning in the 1980s,
is still relatively young and fast moving. The field of music theory-analysis,
during the same period (since 1980), has undergone a major transformation in
terms of technological innovations, flexibility, and breadth. The two fields
have not really caught up with each other. It will be interesting to see what
arises as they do — especially as both fields have become more concerned with
the role of the body and embodied cognition. This paper will consider the
relevant developments in these fields leading up to the present. The most popular approaches to IMS design are rationalist (Ashby 2010), exploiting the ‘correct’ embodiments of
music (Mead 1999, Wessel and Wright 2002, Godøy 2004, Leman 2007, Paine 2009)
based on affordances (Gibson 1977, Kelso 1998). The proposed paper, however,
advocates an experimental pragmatic
(Ashby 2010) approach inspired by music analysis and exploiting the potential
of kinesthetic learning. Prompted by a progressive approach to music analysis,
theory, perception, and cognition (Dubiel 1999, Mailman 2007), interactive
music technology can also be constructive, flexible, and progressive, by
exploiting kinesthetic learning from immersion in new and unusual
motion-to-sound mappings derived from dynamic formal processes in analysed
music. In this way, immersive interactive systems offer an opportunity
systematically to learn new associations based on principles theorised in
response to analysis. Experience of these systems essentially ‘rewires the
brain’, thereby exemplifying what Korsyn (2004) has attributed to Lewin’s
(1986, 1987) approach to music perception: the liberal ironist approach, as formulated by Rorty (1989). Rather
than committing to any particular ways music is already embodied, this
approach acknowledges the contingent status of embodied musical experience. It
forges and uses interactive music technologies continually to redescribe and
therefore reform how music is embodied, expanding how it is heard,
contemplated and experienced.
|