The Pitfall of Diachronicity: 'Explicit' vs. 'Implicit' Musical
Temporality Because music progresses through time, we tend to
take for granted that any analytical reduction of it must achieve a coherent
representation along the time axis as well (Rom 2011). However, this assumption
should be taken for what it is: a tacit, but by no means self-evident
presupposition. To be sure, the temporal dimension of a given musical piece
may demonstrably interact with its musical substance. William Caplin’s
assertion that constituent time-spans express their location within musical
time by way of their intrinsic properties (2009) is generally sustained by
analytical and, more recently, by cognitive studies (e.g. Vallières 2009).
However, while occasional discrepancies between the temporal position of a
given passage and its intrinsic structural properties (see, e.g., Meyer 1973)
do not necessarily undermine the role of temporality in determining musical
form, I propose that comparative analysis, especially when aiming at
statistical evaluation, requires a clearer distinction between ‘implicit
temporality’, that is, the temporal position of a given passage as suggested
by its intrinsic attributes, and ‘explicit temporality’. As will be
demonstrated by an in-depth examination of one particular harmonic phenomenon
(‘minorization’) in Mozart’s instrumental sonata-form movements, analogous
time-spans – in terms of ‘implicit temporality’ – may occur at very different
positions along the piece’s ‘explicit’ time line. While such concepts as
Hepokoski’s and Darcy’s ‘sonata trajectory’ (2006), asserting an essentially
diachronic view of sonata form, admittedly appeal to our intuitive notion of
musical linearity, they may, at the same time, hinder our perception of
analogies between passages sharing ‘implicit’ – but no ‘explicit’ – musical
temporality. Furthermore, a sample survey of Mozart’s sonata-allegro movements
of differing sizes suggests a statistically meaningful correlation between a
movement’s size and its degree of ‘formal irregularity’, i.e., more ‘monumental’
movements tend to abound in irregular ‘leaps’ along the ‘implicit’ musical
time line. |